4.6 Article

Allelic variation in key peptide-binding pockets discriminates between closely related diabetes-protective and diadetes-susceptible HLA-DQB1*06 alleles

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 176, 期 3, 页码 1988-1998

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1988

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HLA-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 is associated with protection against type 1 diabetes (T1D). A similar allele, HLA-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0604, contributes to T1D susceptibility in certain populations but differs only at seven amino acids from HLA-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602. Five of these polymorphisms are found within the peptide-binding groove, suggesting that differences in peptide binding contribute to the mechanism of their association with T1D In this study, we determine the peptide-binding motif for HLA-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0604 allelic protein (DQ0604) in comparison to the established HLA-DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 (DQ0602) motif using binding assays with model peptides from T1D autoantigens and homology modeling using the coordinates of the DQ0602-hypocretin 1-13 crystal structure. The peptide binding preferences were deduced with a peptide from insulin that bound both with a 2- to 3-fold difference in avidity using the same amino acids in the peptide as anchors. Peptide binding differences directly influenced by the polymorphisms in or nearby pockets 1, 6, and 9 were observed. In pocket 1, DQ0604 was better able to accommodate aromatic residues due to the beta 86 and beta 87 polymorphisms. A negatively charged amino acid was preferred by DQ0604 in pocket 6 due to the positively charged beta 30His. In pocket 9, DQ0604 preferred aromatic amino acids due to the 139 and 1330 polymorphisms and had low tolerance of acidic residues. beta 57Val in DQ0604 functions differently than beta 57Ala, in that it pushes alpha 76Arg outside of the pocket, preventing the formation of a salt bridge with an acidic amino acid in the peptide. This study furthers our understanding of the structure-function relationships of MHC class II polymorphisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据