4.7 Article

The N2K consortium. III. Short-period planets orbiting HD 149143 and HD 109749

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 637, 期 2, 页码 1094-1101

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/498557

关键词

planetary systems; stars : individual (HD 149143, HD 109749)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the detection of two short-period planets discovered at Keck Observatory. HD 149143 is a metal-rich G0 IV star with a planet of M sin i = 1.33 M-J and an orbital radius of 0.053 AU. The best-fit Keplerian model has an orbital period, P = 4.072 days, semivelocity amplitude, K = 149.6 m s(-1), and eccentricity, e = 0.016 +/- 0.01. The host star is chromospherically inactive and metal-rich, with [Fe/H] = 0.26. Based on the TeA and stellar luminosity, we derive a stellar radius of 1.49 R-circle dot. Photometric observations of HD 149143 were carried out using the automated photometric telescopes at Fairborn Observatory. HD 149143 is photometrically constant over the radial velocity period to 0.0003 +/- 0.0002 mag, supporting the existence of the planetary companion. No transits were detected down to a photometric limit of approximately 0.02%, eliminating transiting planets with a variety of compositions and constraining the orbital inclination to less than 83 degrees. A short-period planet was also detected around HD 109749, a G3 IV star. HD 109749 is chromospherically inactive, with [Fe/H] = 0.25 and a stellar radius of 1.24. The radial velocities for HD 109749 are modeled by a Keplerian with P = 5.24 days and K = 28.7 m s(-1). The inferred planet mass is M sin i = 0.28 M-J and the semimajor axis of this orbit is 0.0635 AU. Photometry of HD 109749 was obtained with the SMARTS consortium telescope, the PROMPT telescope, and by transitsearch.org observers in Adelaide and Pretoria. These observations did not detect a decrement in the brightness of the host star at the predicted ephemeris time, and they constrain the orbital inclination to less than 85 degrees for gas giant planets with radii down to 0.7R(J).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据