4.3 Review

Insights into the mechanisms of CMV-mediated interference with cellular apoptosis

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY
卷 84, 期 1, 页码 99-106

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2005.01412.x

关键词

apoptosis; Bcl-2; cytomegalovirus; tumour necrosis factor receptor; viral mitochondria-localized inhibitor of apoptosis; viral inhibitor of apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apoptosis has the potential to function as a defence mechanism during viral infection. Identification of CMV mutants that cause the apoptotic death of infected cells confirmed that viral infection activates apoptotic pathways and that this process is counteracted by CMV to ensure efficient viral replication. The recent identification of CMV-encoded proteins that suppress cell death has greatly enhanced our understanding of the mechanisms used by this family of viruses to prevent apoptosis. CMV do not encode homologues of known death-suppressing proteins, suggesting that the CMV family has evolved novel, more sophisticated strategies for the inhibition of apoptosis. The identification and characterization of the human CMV (HCMV)-encoded antiapoptotic proteins UL36 (viral inhibitor of caspase-8 activation [vICA]) and UL37 (viral mitochondria-localized inhibitor of apoptosis [vMIA]) have confirmed that CMV target unique apoptotic control points. For example, vMIA inhibits apoptosis by binding Bax and sequestering it at the mitochondrial membrane as an inactive oligomer. This knowledge not only provides a more complete understanding of the CMV replication process but also allows the identification of previously unrecognized apoptotic checkpoints. Because HCMV is an important cause of birth defects and an increasingly important opportunistic pathogen, a firm grasp of the mechanisms by which it affects cellular apoptosis may provide avenues for the design of improved therapeutic strategies. Here, we review the recent progress made in understanding the role of CMV-encoded proteins in the inhibition of apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据