4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment

期刊

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
卷 112, 期 2-3, 页码 153-162

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.030

关键词

manure management; anaerobic digestion; slurry separation; aeration; straw cover; environmental impact; greenhouse gases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Slurries are a significant source of CH4, NH3 and N2O emissions to the atmosphere. The research project aimed at quantifying CH4, NH3 and N2O emissions from liquid manure stores and after manure application under field conditions. The influence of the manure treatment options no treatment, slurry separation, anaerobic digestion, slurry aeration and straw cover on the emission level was investigated. Approximately 10 m(3) of differently treated slurry were stored in pilot scale slurry tanks. Emissions were followed for c. 80 days. After the storage period, slurries were applied to permanent grassland. Greenhouse gas emissions from slurry were mainly caused by methane emissions during storage and by nitrous oxide emissions after field application of manures. Mitigation of GHG emissions can be achieved by a reduction in slurry dry matter and easily degradable organic matter content. Ammonia emissions mainly occurred after field application. Untreated slurry emitted 226.8 g NH3 m(-3) and 92.4 kg CO2 eq. m(-3) (storage and field application). Slurry separation (liquid fraction and composting of the solid fraction) resulted in NH3 losses of 402.9 g m(-3) and GHG losses of 58.5 kg CO, eq. m(-3). Anaerobic digestion was a very effective means to reduce GHG emissions. 37.9 kg CO2 eq. m(-3) were lost. NH3 emissions were similar to those from untreated slurry. Covering the slurry store with a layer of chopped straw instead of a wooden cover increased NH3 emissions to 320.4 g m(-3) and GHG emissions to 119.7 kg CO2 eq. m(-3). Slurry aeration nearly doubled NH3 emissions compared to untreated slurry. GHG emissions were reduced to 53.3 kg CO2 eq. m(-3). (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据