4.2 Article

Interstitial lung diseases in Saudi Arabia: A single-center study

期刊

ANNALS OF THORACIC MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 33-37

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.105717

关键词

Connective tissue disease; epidemiology; hypersensitivity pneumonitis; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; interstitial lung disease; lung dominant; sarcoidosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: There are relatively few epidemiological studies on interstitial lung disease (ILD) worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To report the incident cases of ILD and compare our data with reports from other populations. METHODS: Newly diagnosed ILDs were prospectively collected at a single tertiary care hospital from January 2008 to December 2011. Detailed demographic and clinical data were collected at the time of diagnosis, along with the results from diagnostic procedures, including high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), serological tests, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), transbronchial lung biopsy, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and surgical lung biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 330 cases were included. The mean age was 55.4 +/- 14.9 years. There was a slight predominance of females (202; 61.2%), and the male-to-female ratio was 1:1.37. The most frequent disease was connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated ILD (34.8%), followed by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (23.3%), sarcoidosis (20%), and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (6.3%). Non-classifiable ILD was present in 1.8% of the total ILD cases. HRCT was performed in 97.3% of the cases, BAL in 17.5%, transbronchial lung biopsy in 21.8%, EBUS-TBNA in 4.5%, and surgical lung biopsy in 22.7% (38.6% of which were performed among the idiopathic interstitial pneumonia cases). CONCLUSIONS: CTD-ILD and IPF were the most frequently observed ILDs in this Saudi Arabian population. Similarities and differences were found with respect to the previous reports from other countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据