4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Brain distribution of cetirizine enantiomers:: Comparison of three different tissue-to-plasma partition coefficients:: Kp, Kp,u, and Kp,uu

期刊

DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 318-323

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.105.007211

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to compare the blood-brain barrier (BBB) transport and brain distribution of levo-(R-CZE) and dextrocetirizine (S-CZE). Microdialysis probes, calibrated using retrodialysis by drug, were placed into the frontal cortex and right jugular vein of eight guinea pigs. Racemic CZE (2.7 mg/kg) was administered as a 60-min i.v. infusion. Unbound and total concentrations of the enantiomers were measured in blood and brain with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The brain distribution of the CZE enantiomers were compared using the parameters K-p, K-p,K-u, K-p,K-uu, and V-u,V-br. K-p compares total brain concentration to total plasma concentration, K-p,K-u compensates for binding in plasma, whereas K-p,K-uu also compensates for binding within the brain tissue and directly quantifies the transport across the BBB. V-u,V-br describes binding within the brain. The stereoselective brain distribution indicated by the K-p of 0.22 and 0.04 for S- and R-CZE, respectively, was caused by different binding to plasma proteins. The transport of the CZE enantiomers across the BBB was not stereoselective, since the K-p,K-uu was 0.17 and 0.14 (N.S.) for S- and R-CZE, respectively. The K-p,K-uu values show that the enantiomers are effluxed to a large extent across the BBB. The Vu, br of approximately 2.5 ml/g brain was also similar for both the enantiomers, and the value indicates high binding to brain tissue. Thus, when determining stereoselectivity in brain distribution, it is important to study all factors governing this distribution, binding in blood and brain, and the BBB equilibrium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据