3.9 Article

Dynamics of lipid droplet-associated proteins during hormonally stimulated lipolysis in engineered adipocytes: Stabilization and lipid droplet binding of adipocyte differentiation-related protein/adipophilin

期刊

MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 459-466

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/me.2005-0323

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK50647, DK30425] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In mature adipocytes, triglyceride is stored within lipid droplets, which are coated with the protein perilipin, which functions to regulate lipolysis by controlling lipase access to the droplet in a hormone-regulatable fashion. Adipocyte differentiation-related protein (ADRP) is a widely expressed lipid droplet binding protein that is coexpressed with perilipin in differentiating fat cells but is minimally present in fully differentiated cultured adipocytes. We find that fibroblasts ectopically expressing C/EBP alpha (NIH-C/EBP alpha cells) differentiate into mature adipocytes that simultaneously express perilipin and ADRP. In response to isoproterenol, perilipin is hyperphosphorylated, lipolysis is enhanced, and subsequently, ADRP expression increases coincident with it surrounding intracellular lipid droplets. In the absence of lipolytic stimulation,inhibition of proteasomal activity with MG-132 increased ADRP levels to those of cells treated with 10 mu M isoproterenol, but ADRP does not surround the lipid droplet in the absence of lipolytic stimulation. We overexpressed a perilipin A construct in NIH-C/EBP alpha cells where the six serine residues known to be phosphorylated by protein kinase A were changed to alanine ( Peri Delta 1 - 6). These cells show no increase in ADRP expression in response to isoproterenol. We propose that ADRP can replace perilipin on existing lipid droplets or those newly formed as a result of fatty acid reesterification, under dynamic conditions of hormonally stimulated lipolysis, thus preserving lipid droplet morphology/structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据