4.7 Article

Discordant twin growth in utero and differences in blood pressure and endothelial function at 8 years of age

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 259, 期 2, 页码 155-163

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01593.x

关键词

arterial structure and compliance; clinical science; developmental biology; endothelium; fetal programming; microcirculation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Low birth weight is associated with increased prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease in adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate genetic and intrauterine environmental contributions to blood pressure (BP) and vascular functions in twins with discordant growth in utero. Subjects. We studied 31 twin pairs (21 monozygous and nine dizygous), mean age 8 years) with large within-pair differences in birth weight. Among the monozygous pairs, nine had suffered from twin-to-twin-transfusion syndrome (TTTS). Methods. Apart from BP, we determined diameters and elasticity of the carotid artery and abdominal aorta with ultrasonography, and endothelial function in skin vessels with a laser Doppler technique, before and after transdermal delivery of acetylcholine and nitroglycerin. Results. Eight of 62 twin subjects had a systolic BP above the 90th percentile in a North-American reference population. Among these, seven/eight were monozygous with a history of poor fetal growth and/or TTTS. In monozygous twin pairs without TTTS, systolic BP and pulse pressure were higher and vascular endothelial function was impaired in the lower birth weight twin. In the TTTS group, the lighter twin had a narrower carotid artery but there was no within-pair difference in arterial elasticity. Pre-eclampsia during the index pregnancy enhanced within-pair differences in BP but abolished within-pair differences in endothelial function. Conclusions. Severe fetal growth retardation contributes to higher BP, arterial narrowing and endothelial dysfunction in childhood. Pre-eclampsia may act both as an effect modifier and confounder of these associations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据