Lack of efficacy of the substance P (neurokinin1 receptor) antagonist aprepitant in the treatment of major depressive disorder

Background: An early clinical trial suggested that the substance P (neurokinin(1) receptor) antagonist, aprepitant, might provide a unique mechanism of antidepressant activity. Phase III trials were conducted to confirm these findings. Methods: Five 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-groups, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials in outpatients with Major Depressive Disorder were performed. Aprepitant 160 mg and placebo were included in all trials. Aprepitant 80 mg and paroxetine 20 mg (active comparator) were included in three trials. Approximately 150 patients were enrolled per treatment group in each trial. The from-baseline of the first 17 items of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) primary end point was the mean change-i score at 8 weeks. A positron emission tomography (PET) study was also performed in normal subjects to determine the relationship between neurokinin(1) receptor occupancy and aprepitant plasma concentrations in closing regimens relevant to the trials. Results. No statistically significant differences from placebo on the HAM-D-17 were observed at week 8 for either close of aprepitant in any of the trials ,whereas paroxetine 20 mg was significantly (p <= .05) more effective than placebo at week 8 in each of the three trials in which it was included. Results from the PET study indicated that the aprepitant dosing regimens provided continuously high levels of neurokinin(1) receptor blockade over 8 weeks. Conclusions. Because the methodology employed confirmed the antidepressant efficacy of paroxetine, the absence of an effect for aprepitant indicates that it was not an effctive treatment for depression. The concept of neurokinin, receptor antagonism as an antidepressant mechanism was not supported.