4.5 Article

Guided tissue regeneration for using a chitosan membrane: An experimental study in rats

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30534

关键词

guided tissue regeneration; chitosan membrane; osteogensis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Barrier membranes are employed clinically to deflect the growth of gingival tissues away from root surface. They provide an isolated space over the regions with the defective tissues that allow the relatively slow growing periodontal ligament fibroblasts to be repopulated onto the root surface. Several makes of bioabsorbable membranes are now commercially available. In this study, we have employed chitosan as barrier membrane material and evaluated it for a guided tissue regeneration application. Three types of chitosan membranes: Chi-NaOH, Chi-Na5P3O10, and Chi-Na2SO3 (each was gelated by NaOH, crosslinked by Na5P3O10, and Na2SO3, respectively), were prepared to be evaluated by the following categories: the mechanical strength to create an effective space, the rapid rate to reach hydrolytic equilibrium in phosphate-buffered solution, and the ease of clinical manipulative operations. Consequently, standardized, transosseous and critical sized skull defects were made in adult rats and the defective regions were covered with the specifically prepared chitosan membranes. After 4 weeks of recovering, varying degrees of bone healing were observed beneath the chitosan membranes in comparison to the control group. The chitosan covered regions showed a clear boundary space between connective tissues and bony tissues. Apparently, this process resulted in a good cell occlusion and beneficial osteogensis effect to the bone. As for the control group, the bone defect was filled with connective tissue, and a destruction of the integrity of newly formed bone was observed. Among the chitosan membranes tested in this study, Chi-NaOH membrane provided a higher percentage of new bone formation than those from the Chi-Na5P3O10, and Chi-Na2SO3 families. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据