4.7 Article

Control of APP processing and Aβ generation level by BACE1 enzymatic activity and transcription

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 285-292

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.05-4986com

关键词

BACE1; secretase; transcription; APP processing; amyloid beta; Alzheimer's disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deposition of amyloid beta protein (A beta) is one of the characteristic features of Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathology. Beta-secretase, a beta-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1), is essential for A beta biosynthesis. Although inhibition of BACE1 is considered a valid therapeutic target for AD, the enzymatic dynamics of BACE1 in regulating APP processing and A beta generation has not yet been fully defined. To examine this issue, tightly controlled inducible BACE1 gene expression was established in the neuronal cell line N2ABP1 and the non-neuronal cell line E2BP1 using an ecdysone-inducible system. The BACE1 protein level was increased in a time- and dosage-dependent manner in the inducible BACE1 stable cells by treatment with inducer ponasterone A. The generation of APP CTF beta, the beta-secretase product, increased proportionally with the level of BACE1 protein expression. However, A beta 40/42 production sharply increased to the plateau level with a relatively small increase in BACE1 expression. Although further increasing BACE1 expression increased beta-secretase activity, it had no additional effect on A beta production. Furthermore, we found that BACE1 mRNA levels and BACE1 promoter activity were significantly lower than APP mRNA levels and APP promoter activity. Our data demonstrate that lower BACE transcription is responsible for the minority of APP undergoing the amyloidogenic pathway and relatively lower A beta production in the normal conditions, and that a slight increase in BACE1 can induce a dramatic elevation in A beta production, indicating that the increase in BACE1 can potentially increase neuritic plaque formation in the pathological condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据