4.8 Article

Solid ionic matrixes for direct tissue analysis and MALDI Imaging

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 78, 期 3, 页码 809-819

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac0514669

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct analysis of tissue by MALDI-MS allows the acquisition of its biomolecular profile while maintaining the integrity of the tissue, giving cellular localization, and avoiding tedious extraction and purification steps. However, direct tissue analysis generally leads to some extent to a lowered spectral quality due to variation in thickness, freezing tissue date, and nature of the tissue. We present here new technical developments for the direct tissue analysis of peptides with ionic liquid made of matrix mixtures (alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA)/2-amino-4-methyl-5-nitropyridine and alpha-cyano-4-hydroxy-cinnamic acid/N,N-dimethylaniline (CHCA/DANI)). The properties of these direct tissue analysis matrixes, especially CHCA/aniline when compared to CHCA, 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid, and sinapinic acid, are as follows: (1) better spectral quality in terms of resolution, sensitivity, intensity, noise, number of compounds detected, and contaminant tolerance, (2) better crystallization on tissues, i.e., coverage capacity, homogeneity of crystallization, homogeneity of crystal sizes, and time of crystallization, (3) better analysis duration in term of vacuum stability, (4) better resistance to laser irradiation especially for high-frequency lasers, (5) better ionic yield in negative mode, and (6) enough fragmentation yield to use the PSD mode on sections to get structural information. Applied to MALDI imaging on a MALDI LIFT-TOF with a 50-Hz laser frequency, these ionic matrixes have allowed the realization of a new type of image in both polarities and reflector mode using the same tissue section. These results give a new outlook on peptide tissue profiling by MS, characterization of compounds from tissue slices, and MALDI-MS high-quality imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据