4.6 Article

Regulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression by tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1β in first trimester human decidual cells -: Implications for preeclampsia

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 168, 期 2, 页码 445-452

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050082

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL070004, 1 R01 HL070004-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study describes a statistically significant increase in macrophages; (CD68-positive cells) in the decidua of preeclamptic patients. To elucidate the regulation of this monocyte infiltration, expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) was assessed in leukocyte-free first trimester decidual cells. Confluent decidual cells were primed for 7 days in either estradiol or estradiol plus medroxyprogesterone acetate to mimic the decidualizing steroidal milieu of the luteal phase and early pregnancy. The medium was exchanged for a serum-free defined medium containing corresponding steroids +/- tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha or interleukin (IL)-1 beta. After 24 hours, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay measurements indicated that the addition of medroxyprogesterone acetate did not affect MCP-1 output, whereas 10 ng/ml of TNF-alpha or IL-1 beta increased output by 83.5-fold +/- 20.6 and 103.1-fold +/- 14.7, respectively (mean +/- SEM, n = 8, P < 0.05). Concentration-response comparisons revealed that even 0.01 ng/ml of TNF-alpha or IL-1 beta elevated MCP-1 output by more than 15-fold. Western blotting confirmed the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results, and quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction confirmed corresponding effects on MCP-1 mRNA levels. The current study demonstrates that TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta enhance MCP-1 in first trimester decidua. This finding suggests a mechanism by which recruitment of excess macrophages to the decidua impairs endovascular trophoblast invasion, the primary placental defect of preeclampsia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据