4.7 Article

Defining disease activity states and clinically meaningful improvement in primary Sjogren's syndrome with EULAR primary Sjogren's syndrome disease activity (ESSDAI) and patient-reported indexes (ESSPRI)

期刊

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
卷 75, 期 2, 页码 382-389

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206008

关键词

-

资金

  1. EULAR [CLI 010]
  2. French Ministry of Health (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique) [P060228]
  3. MRC [G0800629] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0800629] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To define disease activity levels, minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) with the primary Sjogren's syndrome (SS) disease activity indexes: European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) SS disease activity index (ESSDAI) and EULAR SS patient reported index (ESSPRI). Methods For 790 patients from two large prospective cohorts, ESSDAI, physician evaluation of disease activity, ESSPRI and patients' satisfaction with their current health status were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and anchoring methods were used to estimate disease activity levels of ESSDAI and the PASS of ESSPRI. At follow-up visit, patients and physicians assessed, respectively, whether symptoms and disease activity have improved or not. An anchoring method based on this evaluation was used to estimate MCII of ESSDAI and ESSPRI. Results Low-activity (ESSDAI<5), moderate-activity (5 <= ESSDAI <= 13) and high-activity (ESSDAI >= 14) levels were defined. MCII of ESSDAI was defined as an improvement of at least three points. The PASS estimate was defined as an ESSPRI<5 points and MCII as a decrease of at least one point or 15%. Conclusions This study determined disease activity levels, PASS and MCII of ESSDAI and ESSPRI. These results will help designing future clinical trials in SS. For evaluating systemic complications, the proposal is to include patients with moderate activity (ESSDAI >= 5) and define response to treatment as an improvement of ESSDAI at least three points. For addressing patient reported outcomes, inclusion of patients with unsatisfactory symptom state (ESSPRI >= 5) and defining response as an improvement of ESSPRI at least one point or 15% seems reasonable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据