4.8 Article

Cofactor of BRCA1: A novel transcription factor regulator in upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 66, 期 3, 页码 1346-1353

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3593

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 93999, CA 106176] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 064604] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cofactor of BRCA1 (COBRA1) is a newly characterized member of the negative elongation factor (NELF) complex. In this work, we show that COBRA1 is overexpressed in the majority of primary upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas (UGC), and its overexpression correlates with down-regulation of TFF1. We have detected overexpression of COBRA1 mRNA using quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR in 28 (79%) primary UGCs. Immunohistochemical analysis of UGC tissue arrays that contained 70 tumor samples showed moderate-strong staining for COBRA1 in 60 (84%) tumors. Interestingly, the tumor samples showed absent-weak staining for TFF1 in 45 (65%) of the tumors. Simultaneous loss of TFF1 expression and overexpression of COBRA1 was observed in 42 of 70 (60%) tumors. Using small interfering RNA technology with gastric cancer cells, we have shown that COBRA1 inhibition leads to increased TFF1 promoter activity and gene expression. Promoter analysis of TFF1 indicated that regulation of TFF1 by COBRA1 is estrogen independent in contrast to breast cancer. Moreover, COBRA1 regulation of TFF1 in gastric cancer cells was independent of NELF-E. Using several truncated mutants and site mutants of the TFF1 promoter, we have shown that COBRA1 can negatively regulate the activator protein-1 (AP-1) complex at the TFF1 promoter and thus down-regulate TFF1 expression in gastric cancer cell lines. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay showed that COBRA1 attenuates AP-1 binding to DNA. Our results suggest COBRAI as a novel oncogene in UGCs that regulate AP-1 binding and the expression of TFF1 in upper gastric epithelia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据