4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A phase I, pharmacokinetic and biologic correlative study of oblimersen sodium (Genasense™, G3139) and irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 313-321

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdj067

关键词

antisense oligonucleotide; Bcl-2; irinotecan; oblimersen; phase I pharmacokinetics

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [UO1-CA69853, P30-CA54174] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To assess the feasibility and antitumor activity of oblimersen sodium, an antisense oligonucleotide directed to the Bcl-2 mRNA, combined with irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma, characterize the pharmacokinetic behavior of both oblimersen sodium and irinotecan, and examine Bcl-2 protein inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Patients and methods: Patients were treated with escalating doses of oblimersen sodium administered by continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) days 1-8, and irinotecan administered intravenously on day 6 once every 3 weeks. Results: Twenty patients received a total of 84 courses at doses ranging from 3 to 7 mg/kg/day for oblimersen sodium and from 280 to 350 mg/m(2) for irinotecan. Febrile neutropenia and diarrhea limited escalation of oblimersen sodium and irinotecan to 5 mg/kg/day and 350 mg/m(2), respectively. Other toxicities included nausea, vomiting, fever and fatigue. Steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved within 48 h of beginning oblimersen sodium treatment and the agent was undetectable 24 h after the discontinuation of the infusion. Reduction in levels of Bcl-2 protein in PBMC was documented following treatment with oblimersen sodium. One patient experienced a partial response and 10 additional patients had stable disease lasting 2.5-10 months. Conclusions: The combination is well tolerated at the recommended phase II oblimersen sodium dose of 7 mg/kg/day CIVI days 1-8 with irinotecan 280 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 6 every 3 weeks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据