4.7 Article

Regulation of amygdala-dependent learning by brain-derived neurotrophic factor is mediated by extracellular signal-regulated kinase and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 287-296

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300830

关键词

neurotrophin; BNDF; long-term potentiation; learning and memory; amygdala; fear conditioning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study is designed to characterize the signal cascades by which brain-derived neurotrophic factor ( BDNF) modulates long-term memory of fear conditioning. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ( ELISA) and Western blot analysis of tissue homogenates taken from fear-conditioned rats showed an increase in the amygdala of BDNF protein levels and its receptor TrkB phosphorylation. Bilateral administration of a TrkB ligand scavenger TrkB IgG and a Trk-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor K252a to the amygdala impaired fear memory, as measured with fear-potentiated startle. Fear conditioning resulted in the association of Shc and TrkB, Shc and Ras, the increase in active Ras and phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase ( MAPK). Treatment of amygdala slices with BDNF for 15 min increased the levels of active Ras, and MAPK and Akt phosphorylation. BDNF-induced MAPK phosphorylation was completely abolished by MEK inhibitors, and was partially inhibited by farnesyltransferase or phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI-3 kinase) inhibitors. On the other hand, BDNF-induced Akt phosphorylation was unaffected by farnesyltransferase or MEK inhibitors, but could be blocked by PI-3 kinase inhibitors. Together, these data suggest a requirement of BDNF for fear learning. The memory-enhancing effect of BDNF involves the activation of MAPK and PI-3 kinase. BDNF-induced MAPK phosphorylation in the amygdala is mediated via TrkB and the Shc-binding site. Shc binding to TrkB leads to activation of Ras, Raf, and MEK. In addition, BDNF could induce phosphorylation of MAPK via activation of PI-3 kinase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据