4.7 Article

Dengue virus infection of human microvascular endothelial cells from different vascular beds promotes both common and specific functional changes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 78, 期 2, 页码 229-242

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.20532

关键词

virus; flavivirus; endothelium; activation; plasma leakage

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dengue shock syndrome (DSS), the major life threatening outcome of severe dengue disease, which occurs in some patients in the course of dengue infection, is the consequence of plasma leakage in the microvascular territories. Data from clinical and in vitro studies suggest that an inadequate immunological response is partly responsible for the pathophysiology of DSS, but few is known concerning the consequences of direct infection of endothelial cells by dengue virus per se. In this study, an attempt was made to study the response of two microvascular human cell lines originating, respectively, from liver and dermis to infection by a dengue type 2 virus, by analyzing the virus-induced modulation of functional markers. It is shown that the two microvascular cell lines exhibit both common and specific behaviors upon infection. In particular, LSEC and HMEC-1 replicate efficiently the low-passage virus and respond to infection by overproducing inflammatory mediators involved in the cross talk with circulating immune cells. However, direct infection modulates differently the cell surface expression of molecules critically involved in the interactions between endothelial and inflammatory cells. ICAM-1 and HLA-I are up regulated as a consequence of infection in LSEC whereas direct infection results in downregulation of ICAM-1 in HMEC-1. The present results show that infection of human microvascular cells by unadapted dengue virus results in both common and specific activation patterns depending likely on the tissue origin of the cells, thus suggesting that endothelia from different territories may contribute differently to the pathophysiological events in the course of dengue infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据