4.5 Article

Survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - cytotoxic agents compared to corticosteroids

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 100, 期 2, 页码 340-347

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.05.008

关键词

fibrosis; pulmonary; fibrosing alveolitis; cyclophosphamide; prednisone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study objective: To compare the survival of patients with IPF treated retrospectively with corticosteroids atone, to survival of patients treated with immunosuppressive and corticosteroids combined. Design: Non-randomized retrospective cohort study. Setting: Three tertiary centers in Brazil. Patients: Eighty-two IPF patients were included. The diagnosis was confirmed by open lung biopsy in 48. Patients received either corticosteroids alone (group 1) or cytotoxic agents in addition to corticosteroids (group 11). Measurements and results: The primary end-point was mortality. Secondary outcome included longitudinal changes in FVC. Mean age was 66+8 years. FVC was 71 +/- 17% of predicted. There were 48 deaths during the study period (59%), 44 secondary to respiratory causes. From preliminary univariate analysis, for the group as a whole, worse survival was found to be associated with FVC% < 70% of predicted (P = 0.004), evidence of disease progression by follow-up FVC measurements (P = 0.01), and pharmacologic treatment (P = 0.014). Median survival was 25 months for the group 1, and 45 months for the group 11 (Log-Rank = 6.45, P = 0.01). After adjusting for FVC >= 70% and < 70% of predicted, there was evidence to indicate that survival was associated with recommended pharmacologic treatment only in patients with FVC >= 70% (Log Rank = 6.84, P = 0.009). Conclusions: The combination of immunosuppressive agents and prednisone results in better survival when compared to prednisone alone in patients with IPF The benefit seems to occur only in patients with less severe disease, as reflected by FVC >= 70%. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据