4.3 Article

Effect of various formulation parameters on the properties of polymeric nanoparticles prepared by multiple emulsion method

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROENCAPSULATION
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 39-57

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02652040500286185

关键词

biodegradable polymers; nanoparticles; double emulsion; emulsifying agent; cryoprotectant; porosity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work evaluates and interprets underlying mechanisms behind various aspects related to preparation and physical characteristics of polymeric nanoparticles (NP). These were prepared from different biodegradable polymers according to a water-in-oil-in-water emulsion solvent evaporation method. Polymers used were poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA), poly (lactic acid) (PLA), (PLAPEG-PLA) triblock and (PLA-PEG-PLA)(n) multi-block co-polymers. A model DNA, as an example of a hydrophilic drug, was encapsulated in the internal aqueous phase. The primary emulsion was prepared using a high shear turbine mixer. The secondary emulsion was prepared by high-pressure homogenization. Surface morphology and internal structure were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Influence of process variables on the physical properties of NP has been studied. Release of DNA was evaluated. In addition, changes occurring to NP porosity and surface area during degradation were followed. Nanoparticle size was ranging between 200-700nm, according to the preparation conditions. Homogenizing pressure, concentration of the emulsifying agent used, polymer concentration and type and the concentration of a cryoprotectant had variable effects on NP size, surface area and porosity. Batches of NP where no emulsifying agent was added were obtained successfully. The release rate of the DNA from NP was mainly dependent on porosity, which varied significantly among used polymers. The preparation technique was efficient in encapsulating the model DNA and will be used for plasmid encapsulation in a future work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据