4.6 Article

Enhancement of UVB radiation-mediated apoptosis by sanguinarine in HaCaT human immortalized keratinocytes

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 418-429

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0250

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA098368, CA099076] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, we studied the chemopreventive effects of sanguinarine on UVB-mediated responses in human HaCaT immortalized keratinocytes. For our studies, HaCaT cells were treated with a low dose (50 nmol/L) of sanguinarine for 24 hours followed by irradiation with UVB (15 or 30 mJ/ cm 2). Our data showed that UVB exposure, at both doses, resulted in decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis. Interestingly, pretreatment of the cells with sanguinarine caused a significant enhancement in the antiproliferative response of UVB. These responses on UVB and/or sanguinarine treatments were associated with (a) decrease in Bcl-2 and Bcl-X-L and (b) increase in Bax, Bid, and Bak protein levels. Bax knockdown and Bcl-2 overexpression resulted in a rescue of HaCaT cells from sanguinarine-mediated apoptosis. DNA cell cycle analysis revealed that UVB treatment resulted in an accumulation of cells in the G(2)-M phase of the cell cycle, whereas pretreatment of sanguinarine resulted in a significant shift of cells in the S phase at a low UVB dose and a further accumulation of cells in the G2-M phase at a higher UVB dose. These effects on cell cycle were accompanied with modulations in the protein levels of cyclin (B1, E, and A) and cdc2 and cyclin-dependent kinase 1. Furthermore, sanguinarine treatment was found to result in significant modulations in p53, p66Shc, MsrA, and superoxide dismutase levels. Based on our data, we suggest the sanguinarine may protect skin cells from UVB-mediated damages via apoptotic elimination of damaged cells that escape programmed cell death and therefore possess a potential of clonal expansion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据