4.3 Article

Effect of exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia on quadriceps muscle fatigue in healthy humans

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00332.2005

关键词

magnetic stimulation; low- and high-frequency fatigue; quadriceps twitch force; voluntary activation; peripheral fatigue; central fatigue

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL-15469-33, T32 HL-07654-16] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of exercise- induced arterial hypoxemia (EIAH) on quadriceps muscle fatigue was assessed in 11 male endurance-trained subjects [peak O-2 uptake (VO2 peak) = 56.4 +/- 2.8 ml (.) kg(-1) (.) min(-1); mean +/- SE]. Subjects exercised on a cycle ergometer at >= 90% VO2 peak to exhaustion (13.2 +/- 0.8 min), during which time arterial O-2 saturation (Sa(O2)) fell from 97.7 +/- 0.1% at rest to 91.9 +/- 0.9% (range 84-94%) at end exercise, primarily because of changes in blood pH (7.183 +/- 0.017) and body temperature (38.9 +/- 0.2 degrees C). On a separate occasion, subjects repeated the exercise, for the same duration and at the same power output as before, but breathed gas mixtures [inspired O-2 fraction (FIO2) = 0.25-0.31] that prevented EIAH (Sa(O2) = 97-99%). Quadriceps muscle fatigue was assessed via supramaximal paired magnetic stimuli of the femoral nerve (1-100 Hz). Immediately after exercise at FIO2 0.21, the mean force response across 1-100 Hz decreased 335% compared with only 15 +/- 5% when EIAH was prevented (P < 0.05). In a subgroup of four less fit subjects, who showed minimal EIAH at FIO2 0.21 (Sa(O2) = 95.3 +/- 0.7%), the decrease in evoked force was exacerbated by 35% ( P < 0.05) in response to further desaturation induced via FIO2 0.17 (Sa(O2) = 87.8 +/- 0.5%) for the same duration and intensity of exercise. We conclude that the arterial O-2 desaturation that occurs in fit subjects during high-intensity exercise in normoxia (-6 +/- 1% Delta Sa(O2) from rest) contributes significantly toward quadriceps muscle fatigue via a peripheral mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据