4.7 Article

Subcutaneous injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate compared with leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 85, 期 2, 页码 314-325

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1315

关键词

endometriosis; depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; leuprolide; bone mineral density; hypoestrogenic symptoms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of SC depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC 104) with that of leuprolide acetate in treatment of endometriosis. Design: Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded, comparator-controlled trial. Setting: Clinical trial sites in Canada and United States. Patient(s): Two hundred seventy-four women with surgically diagnosed endometriosis. Intervention(s): Intramuscular injections of DMPA-SC (104 mg) or leuprolide acetate (11.25 mg), given every 3 months for 6 months, with 12 months of posttreatment follow-up. Main Outcome Measure(s): Reduction in five endomeuiosis symptoms or signs (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, pelvic induration); change in bone mineral density (BMD), hypoestrogenic symptoms, bleeding, and weight. Result(s): The depot rnedroxyprogesterone acetate given SC was statistically equivalent to leuprolide in reducing four of five endometriosis symptoms or signs at the end of treatment (month 6) and in reducing all five symptoms after 12 months' follow-up (month 18). Patients in the DMPA-SC 104 group showed significantly less BMD loss than did leuprolide patients at month 6, with scores returning to baseline at 12 months' follow-up. No statistically significant differences in median weight changes were observed between groups. Compared with leuprolide, DMPA-SC 104 was associated with fewer hypoestrogenic symptoms but more irregular bleeding. Conclusion(s): Efficacy of DMPA-SC 104 was equivalent to that of leuprolide for reducing endometriosis-associated pain, with less impact on BMD and fewer hypoestrogenic side effects but more bleeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据