4.3 Article

Dendritic cells in multiple sclerosis lesions: Maturation stage, myelin uptake, and interaction with proliferating T cells

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/01.jnen.0000199572.96472.1c

关键词

dendritic cells; lectins; multiple sclerosis; myelin uptake; T cell proliferation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In multiple sclerosis (MS), dendritic cells (DCs) recruited to the central nervous system (CNS) are thought to be involved in the regulation of autoimmune responses directed against myelin antigens. To better understand the role of DCs in CNS inflammation, we performed a detailed immunohistochemical analysis of DC maturation markers and of DC relationship to CNS-infiltrating T cells in autopsy brain tissue of patients with MS. We also investigated the presence of DCs containing myelin debris in MS lesions. Myeloid DC subsets were identified using the following markers: CD 1 a for immature DCs; DC-SIGN for immature and mature DCs; and fascin, CD83, DC-LAMP, and CCR7 for mature DCs. The most common finding was the presence of cells expressing DC-SIGN and containing myelin components in the perivascular cuffs of early active and chronic (both active and inactive) MS lesions. Perivascular CD1a(+) DCs were detected in active lesions in only one of 10 patients with MS who were examined. Although less numerous than DC-SIGN(+) DCs, cells expressing mature DC markers were consistently detected in the inflamed meninges and perivascular cuffs of most active lesions examined. CCR7 immunostaining was predominantly confined to activated microglia at the lesion edges. Some perivascular DC-SIGN(+) cells were found in close proximity to or contacting rare proliferating lymphocytes, most of which expressed the DC-SIGN ligand ICAM-3 and CD8. These data suggest that DCs recruited and maturing in MS lesions, where self-antigens are made available by continuous myelin destruction, may contribute to the local activation and expansion of presumably pathogenic T cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据