4.0 Article

Platelet storage lesion: An update on the impact of various leukoreduction processes on the biological response modifiers

期刊

TRANSFUSION AND APHERESIS SCIENCE
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 125-130

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2005.09.002

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, platelet concentrates are produced either from pooled huffy which are leukoreduced during processing, by various types of WBC removal filters and several apheresis technologies, which are leukocyte-reduced during collection with or without filtration. It is therefore important to define the impact of various leukocyte-removal processes on the acceleration of platelet storage of lesion and cellular apoptosis/necrosis. This overview briefly highlights the effects of exposure to artificial surfaces, during apheresis leukoreduction processes and platelet storage bags on the development of the platelet storage lesion that may contribute to transfusion reactions. The results obtained from three plateletpheresis technologies are compared with data from a like with like study on buffy-coat-derived platelet concentrates, using three types of platelet filter/pack assemblies. Emphasis is placed on the combined preparative methods and storage bags on generation/removal of. kallikrein/kinin; activated complement, leukocytes and platelet-derived cytokines and the development of cellular injuries, measured by the release of Annexin V. There was no systematic evidence of significant cellular fragmentation caused by filtration, but the combined preparative methods and storage bags appears to have some impact on the rate of release of soluble HLA. Moreover, large variability was observed between and within groups, in terms of various laboratory markers of biocompatibility and major biological response modifiers, indicating that much still remains to be done on various aspects of quality improvement to fully abrogate platelet concentrates associated transfusion reactions. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据