4.1 Article

Mechanical behavior of bovine periodontal ligament under tension-compression cyclic displacements

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES
卷 114, 期 1, 页码 74-82

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00269.x

关键词

bovine; compression; hysteresis; molar; soft tissue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, the mechanical response of bovine periodontal ligament (PDL) subjected to displacement-controlled tension-compression harmonic oscillations and subsequent rupture was examined. Specimens including dentine, cementum, PDL, and alveolar bone were extracted from different depths and locations of bovine first molars. They were immersed in a saline solution at room temperature and clamped on their bone and dentine extremities. The samples were tested at +/- 35% of the PDL's width, with a frequency of 1 Hz. The mechanical parameters evaluated were hysteresis, phase lag, and the modulus of the stress-stretch ratio curves in tension and compression. The tensile strength and the corresponding stretch ratio were also recorded. Stress-stretch ratio curves indicated a non-linear, time-dependent response with hysteresis and preconditioning effects. The hysteresis and phase lag in compression were much higher than in tension, suggesting that the dissipated energy was higher in compression than in tension. The root depth and location did not play essential roles for the tension or compression data, with the exception of limited statistical differences for tensile strength and corresponding stretch ratio. Thus, biological variability in the specimens, as a result of different bone contours, PDL width, and fiber orientation, did not affect the energy-absorbing capacity of the PDL. The evolution of the stress rate with stress demonstrated a constant increase of stiffness with stress. The stiffness values were twofold higher in tension than in compression. The data also showed that the stiffness of the PDL was comparable with data reported for other soft tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据