4.6 Article

A new quality assessment parameter for optical coherence tomography

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 186-190

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.059824

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [P30-EY008098, R01 EY011289-20, R01 EY011289, R01 EY013178, R01-EY11289-21, P30 EY008098, R01 EY013178-06, R01-EY013178-6] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To create a new, automated method of evaluating the quality of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and to compare its image quality discriminating ability with the quality assessment parameters signal to noise ratio (SNR) and signal strength (SS). Methods: A new OCT image quality assessment parameter, quality index (QI), was created. OCT images (linear macular scan, peripapillary circular scan, and optic nerve head scan) were analysed using the latest StratusOCT system. SNR and SS were collected for each image. QI was calculated based on image histogram information using a software program of our own design. To evaluate the performance of these parameters, the results were compared with subjective three level grading (excellent, acceptable, and poor) performed by three OCT experts. Results: 63 images of 21 subjects (seven each for normal, early/moderate, and advanced glaucoma) were enrolled in this study. Subjects were selected in a consecutive and retrospective fashion from our OCT imaging database. There were significant differences in SNR, SS, and QI between excellent and poor images (p = 0.04, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively, Wilcoxon test) and between acceptable and poor images ( p = 0.02, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Only QI showed significant difference between excellent and acceptable images (p = 0.001). Areas under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for discrimination of poor from excellent/acceptable images were 0.68 (SNR), 0.89 (IQP), and 0.99 (QI). Conclusion: A quality index such as QI may permit automated objective and quantitative assessment of OCT image quality that performs similarly to an expert human observer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据