4.6 Article

Vertical distribution of Galactic disk stars -: III.: The Galactic disk surface mass density from red clump giants

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 446, 期 3, 页码 933-942

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053538

关键词

stars : kinematics; Galaxy : disk; Galaxy : fundamental parameters; Galaxy : kinematics and dynamics; Galaxy : structure; solar neighbourhood

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used red clump stars to measure the surface mass density of the Galactic disk in the solar neighbourhood. High resolution spectra of red clump stars towards the NGP have been obtained with the ELODIE spectrograph at OHP for Tycho-2 selected stars, and nearby Hipparcos counterparts were also observed. We determined their distances, velocities, and metallicities to measure the gravitational force law perpendicular to the Galactic plane. As in most previous studies, we applied one-parameter models of the vertical gravitational potential. We obtained a disk surface mass density within 1.1 kpc of the Galactic plane, Sigma(1.1) (kpc) = 64 +/- 5 M(circle dot)pc(- 2), with an excellent formal accuracy, however we found that such one-parameter models can underestimate the real uncertainties. Applying two-parameter models, we derived more realistic estimates of the total surface mass density within 800 pc from the Galactic plane, Sigma(0.8 kpc) = 57-66 M(circle dot)pc(-2), and within 1.1 kpc, Sigma(1.1) (kpc) = 57-79 M(circle dot)pc(-2). This can be compared to literature estimates of similar to 40 M(circle dot)pc(-2) in stars and to 13 M(circle dot)pc(-2) in the less accurately measured ISM contribution. We conclude that there is no evidence of large amounts of dark matter in the disk and, furthermore, that the dark matter halo is round or not very much flattened. A by-product of this study is the determination of the half period of oscillation by the Sun through the Galactic plane, 42 +/- 2Myr, which cannot be related to the possible period of large terrestrial impact craters similar to 33-37 Myr.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据