4.8 Article

Primary prophylaxis with nadolol in cirrhotic patients: Doppler patterns of splanchnic hemodynamics in good and poor responders

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 310-316

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.015

关键词

portal hypertension; echo-color-Doppler; HVPG; primary prohylaxis; beta-blockers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: We aimed to characterize by echo-color-Doppler the splanchnic hemodynamics of patients good and poor responders to primary prophylaxis with nadolol. Methods: Thirty cirrhotic patients (Child-score 7.0 +/- 1.8) with medium/large esophageal varices without previous bleedings were consecutively enrolled. At inclusion and after 3 months of treatment with nadolol, they underwent a splanchnic echo-color-Doppler study and a measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). Results: Nadolol (60 +/- 36 mg/day; range 20-160) induced a significant reduction of HVPG (16.6 +/- 6.1 vs. 19.4 +/- 4.6 mmHg, P < 0.0001). 13 patients (43.3%) were hemodynamic responders. Responders and Poor-responders had similar baseline clinical characteristics. Poor-responders at baseline were characterized by lower impedance indexes in superior mesenteric artery (SMA) (PI 2.29 +/- 0.45 vs. 2.74 +/- 0.46; P = 0.01; RI 0.83 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.86 +/- 0.03; P = 0.02), hepatic artery (HA) (PI 1.41 +/- 0.19 vs. 1.79 +/- 0.48; P = 0.03; RI 0.71 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.80 +/- 0.07; P = 0.02), and splenic artery (SA) (PI 1.18 +/- 0.27 vs. 1.73 +/- 0.40; P = 0.01; RI 0.66 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.73 +/- 0.09; P = 0.02), and by higher mean flow velocity of HA (52.6 +/- 21.6 vs. 26.5 +/- 9.5 cm/s; P = 0.02) and SMA (49.7 +/- 14.5 vs. 33.9 +/- 13.1 cm/s; P = 0.06). Conclusions: Cirrhotic patients poor-responders to nadolol show a pronounced arterial splanchnic vasodilatation at a baseline echo-color-Doppler study. This can be considered a non-invasive clue for the a priori identification of this subgroup of patients. (C) 2005 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据