4.3 Article

Causes, characteristics and consequences of anovulatory follicles in superovulated sheep

期刊

DOMESTIC ANIMAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 76-87

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2005.06.001

关键词

anovulatory follicle; fertilization; estradiol; superovulation; sheep

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficiency of superovulatory protocols is affected by the occurrence of reproductive abnormalities, such as the presence of anovulatory follicles. The objective of current study was to assess the incidence and possible causes of anovulatory follicles in superovulated sheep, in order to characterize the endocrine functionality of these follicles in terms of estradiol production and to evaluate their relationship with development of embryos from other follicles. The number and size of all follicles present in the ovaries of 12 sheep treated with a superovulatory FSH step-down treatment was assessed by ultrasonography. On Day 3 after subsequent estrus behaviour, the number of corpora lutea and anovulatory follicles were recorded and the fluid of anovulatory follicles >= 5 rum in size was aspirated and assayed for estradiol. At once, embryos were recovered to evaluate their viability. In current study, anovulatory structures averaged 34.6% of the follicles developing to preovulatory sizes. The number of anovulatory follicles was determined by the existence of follicular dominance effects, since they increased with a higher difference in size between the largest and the second largest follicle at the beginning of the superovulatory treatment (P < 0.05, r(2) = 0.420). Most of the anovulatory follicles showed signs of functionality failures, indicated by a low mean estradiol concentration (9.9 +/- 1.1 ng/ml). However, a 22.4% of them were highly estrogenic (> 200 ng/ml) and their permanence beyond the Ovulation was related to a drop in the embryo viability rate (P < 0.005), leading to decreased final superovulatory yields. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据