4.7 Article

Influence of cardiovascular risk factors on endothelial progenitor cells - Limitations for therapy?

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000198239.41189.5d

关键词

endothelial progenitor cells; risk factors; apoptosis; endothelium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ideal way to prevent and cure atherosclerosis and the subsequent end organ damage is to restore and rejuvenate the dysfunctional vasculature and the damaged organs. Various studies have underlined the important role of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis of ischemic tissue, but only a few studies have concentrated on the role of EPCs in the prevention and therapy of atherosclerosis. Extended endothelial cell damage by cardiovascular risk factors can result in endothelial cell apoptosis with loss of the integrity of the endothelium. The consequences are an increased vascular permeability of the endothelium followed by facilitated migration of monocytes and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, resulting in the premature manifestation of an atherosclerotic lesion. A growing body of evidence suggests that circulating EPCs play an important role in endothelial cell regeneration. Systemic transfusion or intrinsic mobilization of EPCs enhances the restoration of the endothelium after focal endothelial denudation, resulting in a diminished neointima formation. In mice with atherosclerotic lesions, bone-marrow-derived stem cells are able to reduce atherosclerotic plaque size. However, various studies have demonstrated that in humans, cardiovascular risk factors impair number and function of EPCs, potentially restricting the therapeutic potential of progenitor cells. The current review focuses on the role of cardiovascular risk factors on endothelial cell apoptosis and EPCs with its pathophysiological consequences for atherogenesis and a regenerative therapy approach and will highlight the role of EPCs as a marker for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据