4.3 Article

Ultrasound-guided interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of advanced vaginal recurrences from cervical and endometrial carcinoma

期刊

STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
卷 182, 期 2, 页码 86-+

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-006-1420-4

关键词

primary radiotherapy; interstitial brachytherapy; vaginal recurrence; ultrasound

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In advanced vaginal recurrences of cervical and endometrial carcinomas therapeutic options are rare because of preceding therapy. Patients and Methods: 23 patients developing advanced vaginal recurrences of cervical and endometrial carcinomas were included. 15 patients started with external-beam therapy to the pelvis and eight patients after preceding radiotherapy underwent brachytherapy alone. All patients had ultrasound-guided implantation of transvaginal or transperineal interstitial needles for brachytherapy. Median prescribed total dose was 64 Gy. Results: 18 patients (78%) achieved complete remission. Six patients are alive without tumor and one with tumor after a median follow-up of 64 months. 14 patients died of tumor and two of intercurrent disease. 5-year disease-specific survival and local control rate were 43% and 47%, respectively, in patients with complete remission. Univariate analysis found time to relapse > 2 years, initial diameter : 4 cm, initial volume < 15 cm(3), no extension to the pelvic side wall, volume before brachytherapy < 7.5 cm(3), brachytherapy coverage index > 0.8, and prescribed total dose > 64 Gy being positive predictors for Local control and survival. Conclusion: The use of ultrasound guidance for placement of interstitial needles in temptate-based brachytherapy of advanced recurrent gynecologic malignancies is a feasible, safe, and cheap method with encouraging results. Today, ultrasound imaging can be also used to some extent for treatment planning which requires further development. Patient- and treatment-retated prognostic factors can be defined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据