4.7 Article

Versatile framework solids constructed from divalent transition metals and citric acid: Syntheses, crystal structures, and thermal behaviors

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 375-381

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cg0503245

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reactions of citric acid (C6H8O7 = H(4)cit with various divalent transition metals (C-II, Zn-II, Cu-II, and Co-II) in acid solution or under hydrothermal conditions (pH = 1-4) have resulted in the isolation of five new coordination polymers with versatile multidimensional frameworks. The five metal citrate complexes, namely, [Cd-3(Hcit)(2)(H2O)(5)center dot H2O](n) (1), [Cd-3(Hcit)(2)(H2O2](n) (2), [Zn-3(Hcit)(2)(H2O)(2)](n) (3), [Cu-2(cit)(H2O)(2)](n) (4), and [Co(H(2)cit)(H2O)](n) (5), have been characterized by elemental analysis, FT-IR spectra, thermal analysis, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies. While complex 1 was obtained by evaporation of an EtOH-H2O solution of the reaction mixture, complexes 2-5 were all prepared under hydrothermal conditions. The crystal structures of the five complexes are remarkably distinct from each other because of the different synthetic conditions or coordination nature of the metal ions. Complex 1 features a 2D multilayered framework which contains ail infinite 1D ladder-like structure. Complexes 2 and 3 are almost isostructural, and both exhibit 2D rhombus-grid frameworks. The copper(II) citrate complex 4 displays a new alkyloxyl-bridging coordination mode, different from other divalent metal citrate complexes. Consequently, the complex forms a 3D open-framework polymer with large void channels. Complex 5 crystallizes in a chiral space group and forms a ID infinite helical chain along a 2(1) axis. The thermal behaviors of the five coordination complexes have been investigated and discussed correlated with the crystal structures in detail. Particularly, the open-framework structure of 4 is responsible for the reversible water desorption-adsorption process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据