4.4 Review

All roads lead to disconnection?: Traumatic axonal injury revisited

期刊

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
卷 148, 期 2, 页码 181-+

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-005-0674-4

关键词

caspase; calpain; spectrin; traumatic axonal injury

资金

  1. FIC NIH HHS [1-R03-TW0131302A1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS20193] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) evokes widespread/diffuse axonal injury (TAI) significantly contributing to its morbidity and mortality. While classic theories suggest that traumatically injured axons are mechanically torn at the moment of injury, studies in the last two decades have not supported this premise in the majority of injured axons. Rather, current thought considers TAI a progressive process evoked by the tensile forces of injury, gradually evolving from focal axonal alteration to ultimate disconnection. Recent observations have demonstrated that traumatically induced focal axolemmal permeability leads to local influx of Ca2+ stop with the subsequent activation of the cysteine proteases, calpain and caspase, that then play a pivotal role in the ensuing pathogenesis of TAI via proteolytic digestion of brain spectrin, a major constituent of the subaxolemmal cytoskeletal network, the membrane skeleton. In this pathological progression this local Ca2+ stop overloading with the activation of calpains also initiates mitochondrial injury that results in the release of cytochrome-c, with the activation of caspase. Both the activated calpain and caspases then participate in the degradation of the local axonal cytoskeleton causing local axonal failure and disconnection. In this review, we summarize contemporary thought on the pathogenesis of TAI, while discussing the potential diversity of pathological processes observed within various injured fiber types. The anterograde and retrograde consequences of TAI are also considered together with a discussion of various experimental therapeutic approaches capable of attenuating TAI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据