4.5 Article

Arterial hypotension triggers perifocal depolarizations and aggravates secondary damage in focal brain injury

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1071, 期 1, 页码 237-244

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.095

关键词

brain injury; cerebral blood flow; cold lesion; depolarization; spreading depression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perifocal depolarizations (PFD) have been observed after traumatic brain injury, are known to disturb cerebrovascular reactivity and thus may contribute to the morphological consequences of brain injury. In this investigation, the role of PFD was studied in focal brain lesions with/without induction of delayed hypotension. Cerebral freeze lesions were induced in anesthetized normotensive rats that underwent perfusion fixation of brains S min, 4 h or 24 h after lesioning, respectively, to obtain quantitative histopathology. In additional groups, a 45-min period of moderate hypobaric hypotension was applied 15 min post-trauma and brains were perfusion fixed after 4 h or 24 h. In a second series, the direct current (DC) potential and cortical laser-Doppler flow (LDF) were measured adjacent to lesions under normotensive or hypotensive conditions. Sham procedures were carried out in rats that underwent hypotension alone. Lesioning resulted in a significant LDF decrease to 50% of baseline, further decreased during hypotension to less than 40% of control (P < 0.05). Sham animals had LDF values between 60 and 70% of control when subjected to hypotension. Focal brain injury always induced a negative DC shift shortly after lesioning. In 6 of 8 rats that under-went cold lesion plus hypotension, a second PFD was observed approximately 2.5 min after onset of hypotension accompanied by a relative LDF increase by 25 +/- 12%. Lesion expansion was significantly worsened by hypotension (8.19 +/- 0.56 mm(3) at 24 h) compared with normotensive rats (7.01 +/- 0.3 mm(3) at 24 h, P < 0.01). We conclude that hypotension triggers depolarizations by an ischemic mechanism that contributes to final tissue damage. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据