4.6 Article

Initial transcriptome and proteome analyses of low culture temperature-induced expression in CHO cells producing erythropoietin

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 93, 期 2, 页码 361-371

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.20717

关键词

CHO cells; erythropoietin; genomics; low culture temperature; proteomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low culture temperature is known to enhance the specific productivity of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing erythropoietin (EPO) (LGE10-9-27). Genomic and proteomic approaches were taken to better understand the intracellular responses of these CHO cells resulting from use of low culture temperature (33 degrees C). For transcriptome analysis, commercially available rat and mouse cDNA microarrays were used. The data obtained from the rat and mouse cDNA chips were only somewhat informative in understanding the gene expression profile of CHO cells because of their different sequence homologies with CHO transcriptomes. Overall, transcriptome analysis revealed that low culture temperature could lead to changes in gene expression in various cellular processes such as metabolism, transport, and signaling pathways. Proteome analysis was carried out using 2-D PAGE. Based on spot intensity, 60 high intensity protein spots, from a total of more than 800, were chosen for MS analysis. Forty of the 60 protein spots, which represent 26 different kinds of proteins, were identified by MALDI-TOFMS and validated by MS/MS. Compared to the reference temperature (37 degrees C), the expression levels of seven proteins (PDI, vimentin, NDK B, ERp57, RIKEN cDNA, phosphoglycerate kinase, and heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein) were increased over twofold at 33 degrees C and those of two proteins (HSP90-beta and EF2) were decreased over twofold at 33 degrees C. Taken together, the results demonstrate the potential of combined analysis of transcriptome and proteome analyses as a tool for the systematic comprehension of cellular mechanisms in CHO cells. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据