4.5 Article

Activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway in the rat basilar artery after subarachnoid hemorrhage

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1072, 期 1, 页码 1-7

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.003

关键词

subarachnoid hemorrhage; interleukin-6; signal transduction; phosphorylation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) is one of the most important signaling pathways transducing signals from the cell surface in response to cytokines. Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) produces cytokines in the CSF. We investigated whether this signaling pathway is activated in the rat basilar artery after SAH by cytokines. in a rat single-hemorrhage model of SAH, basilar arteries and CSF were obtained until 7 days after SAH. The concentration of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in CSF was measured by ELISA. Western blot analysis with JAK1, phosphospecific-JAK1, STAT3, phosphospecific STAT3 at Tyr(705) and Ser(727), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and actin antibodies was performed in basilar artery. The expressions of STAT3, phosphospecific STAT3 at Tye(705) and Ser(727), and COX-2 in basilar artery were examined by immunohistochemical studies. The concentration of IL-6 immediately increased after SAH and Western blot analysis revealed that JAK1 was phosphorylated within 2 h, accompanied by phosphorylation of STAT3 at Tyr(705), extending to Ser(727) at days 1-2. Immunohistochemistry revealed phosphorylation of STAT3 to occur in endothelial and smooth muscle cells of the basilar artery. In addition, intracisternal injection of IL-6 by itself significantly increased phosphorylation of STAT3 at Tyr(705) and Ser(127). Expression of COX-2 was also upregulated in endothelial cells of the basilar artery. These results indicate that SAH produces the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 in the CSF, which activates the JAK-STAT signaling pathway in the basilar artery and induces transcription of immediate early genes. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据