期刊
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 212, 期 1, 页码 318-337出版社
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.06.020
关键词
hypervelocity impact; artificial viscosity; Riemann problem; hydrocode
Four different shock-capturing schemes used in smooth particle hydrodynamics are compared as applied to moderately high-velocity impacts (at 3 km/s) and hypervelocity impacts (at similar to 6 km/s) of metallic projectiles on thin metal plates. The target and projectile may be of same metal or different. The simulations are compared with previously published experimental data and simulations. The schemes differ in how artificial viscosity (AV) is treated and include (i) standard SPH AV, (ii) Balsara's AV (BAL), (iii) Morris and Monaghan's AV (MON) and (iv) Riemann-based contact algorithm (CON) of Parshikov et al. At moderately high impact velocity, CON performed best overall, in particular, in being free from numerical fracture and formation of clumps, problems that plague SAV and its modifications, BAL and MON. For the hypervelocity impact, CON does not produce correct debris cloud. The BAL and MON while reproducing the debris cloud more closely, overestimate the crater diameter significantly. An excessive AV, by enhancing transverse momentum flow, may be the source of the overestimation of crater diameter. Experimental agreement is generally worse when the target and projectile are formed of distinct metals. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Inc.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据