4.6 Article

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment enhances the efficacy of cellular cardiomyoplasty with transplantation of embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in infarcted myocardium

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.12.044

关键词

embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; myocardial infarction; neovascularization; myocardial regeneration; cellular cardiomyoplasty

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We tested the hypothesis that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration would enhance the efficacy of cellular cardiomyoplasty with embryonic stem (ES) cell-derived cardiomyocytes in infarcted myocardium. Three weeks after myocardial infraction by cryoinjury, Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to receive either an injection of medium, ES cell-derived cardiomyocyte transplantation, G-CSF administration, or a combination of G-CSF administration and ES cell-derived cardiomyocyte transplantation. Eight weeks after treatment, the cardiac tissue formation, neovascularization. and apoptotic activity in the infarct regions were evaluated by histology and immunohistochemistry. The left ventricular (LV) dimensions and function of the treated heart were evaluated by echocardiography. Transplanted ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes survived and participated in the myocardial regeneration in the infarcted heart. A combination of G-CSF treatment and ES cell-derived cardiomyocyte transplantation significantly promoted angiogenesis and reduced the infarct area and cell apoptosis in the infarcted myocardium compared with ES cell-derived cardiomyocyte transplantation alone. The combination therapy also attenuated LV dilation, as compared with ES cell-derived cardiomyocyte transplantation alone. G-CSF treatment can enhance the efficacy of cellular cardiomyoplasty by ES cell-derived cardiomyocyte transplantation to treat myocardial infarction. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据