4.7 Article

Phosphodiester and N-glycosidic bond cleavage in DNA induced by 4-15 eV electrons

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 124, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2166364

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thin molecular films of the short single strand of DNA, GCAT, were bombarded under vacuum by electrons with energies between 4 and 15 eV. Ex vacuo analysis by high-pressure liquid chromatography of the samples exposed to the electron beam revealed the formation of a multitude of products. Among these, 12 fragments of GCAT were identified by comparison with reference compounds and their yields were measured as a function of electron energy. For all energies, scission of the backbone gave nonmodified fragments containing a terminal phosphate, with negligible amounts of fragments without the phosphate group. This indicates that phosphodiester bond cleavage by 4-15 eV electrons involves cleavage of the C-O bond rather than the P-O bond. The yield functions exhibit maxima at 6 and 10-12 eV, which are interpreted as due to the formation of transient anions leading to fragmentation. Below 15 eV, these resonances dominate bond dissociation processes. All four nonmodified bases are released from the tetramer, by cleavage of the N-glycosidic bond, which occurs principally via the formation of core-excited resonances located around 6 and 10 eV. The formation of the other nonmodified products leading to cleavage of the phosphodiester bond is suggested to occur principally via two different mechanisms: (1) the formation of a core-excited resonance on the phosphate unit followed by dissociation of the transient anion and (2) dissociation of the CO bond of the phosphate group formed by resonance electron transfer from the bases. In each case, phosphodiester bond cleavage leads chiefly to the formation of stable phosphate anions and sugar radicals with minimal amounts of alkoxyl anions and phosphoryl radicals. (c) 2006 American Institute of Physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据