4.4 Article

Disease progression in patients with virological suppression in response to HAART is associated with the degree of immunological response

期刊

AIDS
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 371-377

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.aids.0000196180.11293.9a

关键词

virological response; immunological response; CD4 cells; antiretroviral therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine if immunological response is associated with disease progression in patients with virological suppression after initiating HAART. Design: A cohort study of 1084 treatment-naive participants in the British Columbia HIV/AlDS Drug Treatment Program who had achieved viral loads < 500 copies/ml at 3-9 months after initiating triple-drug therapy. Methods: Cox proportional hazards was used to model the association with disease progression of baseline variables, change in CD4 cell counts and CD4 cell count strata at 6 months. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations with two definitions of poor immunological response. Results: Patients were followed for a median of 51.4 months. In univariate analyses, increases in CD4 cell counts of < 25 cells/mu l and absolute CD4 cell counts of < 200 cells/mu l were associated with an increased risk of death or new AIDS events. Two mulitivariate models, one including baseline CD4 cell count and change in CD4 cell count from baseline and the other including only absolute CD4 cell counts at 6 months, were found to predict disease progression in this setting. Increases in CD4 cell count of < 25 cells/mu l were associated with increasing age and inversely associated with low baseline CD4 cell counts, high baseline viral loads and good adherence to therapy. CD4 cell counts of < 200 cells/mu l at 6 months were associated with low baseline CD4 cell counts and having AIDS at baseline. Conclusion: Patients with virological suppression are still at risk for HIV disease progression if adequate immunological responses are not achieved. (C) 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据