4.8 Article

The glycophorin CN-linked glycan is a critical component of the ligand for the Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte receptor BAEBL

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0510648103

关键词

mutations; oligosaccharides; DBL family

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R21 AI045086, AI45086, R01 AI045086] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmodium vivax uses a single member of the Duffy binding-like (DBL) receptor family to invade erythrocytes and is not found in West Africa where its erythrocyte ligand, the Duffy blood group antigen, is missing. In contrast, Plasmodium falciparum expresses four members of the DBL family, and remarkably, single-point mutations of two of these receptors (BAEBL and JESEBL) bind to entirely different erythrocyte ligands, greatly expanding the range of erythrocytes that A falciparum can invade. in this article, we describe the molecular basis of the binding specificity for one BAEBL variant (VSTK) that binds to glycophorin C. We demonstrate that soluble glycophorin C completely blocks the binding of BAEBL (VSTK) to human erythrocytes, requiring 0.7 mu M for 50% inhibition, a concentration similar to that required by glycophorin A to block the binding of erythrocyte-binding antigen 175 to erythrocytes. BAEBL (VSTK) does not bind to Gerbich-negative erythrocytes that express a truncated form of glycophorin C because it lacks exon 3. The N-linked oligosaccharide of Gerbich-negative glycophorin C has a markedly different composition than the wild-type glycophorin C. Moreover, removal of the Winked oligosaccharide from the wild-type glycophorin C eliminates its ability to inhibit binding of BAEBL (VSTK) to erythrocytes. These findings are consistent with the ligand for BAEBL (VSTK) being, in part, the N-linked oligosaccharide and suggest that single-point mutations in BAEBL allow A falciparum to recognize oligosaccharides on different erythrocyte surface glycoproteins or glycolipids, greatly increasing its invasion range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据