4.8 Article

ALADINI482S causes selective failure of nuclear protein import and hypersensitivity to oxidative stress in triple A syndrome

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505598103

关键词

aprataxin; DNA ligase I; nuclear pore complex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triple A syndrome is an autosomal recessive neuroendocrinological disease caused by mutations in a gene that encodes 546 amino acid residues. The encoded protein is the nucleoporin ALADIN, a component of nuclear pore complex (NPC). We identified a mutant ALADIN(1482S) that fails to target NPC and investigated the consequences of mistargeting using cultured fibroblasts (1482Sf) from a patient with triple A syndrome. ALADIN(1482s) affected a katyopherin-alpha/beta-mediated import pathway and decreased nuclear accumulations of aprataxin (APTX), a repair protein for DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs), and of DNA ligase I in 1482Sf. This decrease was restored by wild-type ALADIN. ALADIN1482s had no effect on imports of M9/kap-beta 2, BIB/kap-beta 3, histone H1/importin 7, the ubiquitin conjugating enzyme UbcM2/importin 11, or the spliceo-some protein U1A, indicating that ALADIN1482S selectively impaired transport of discrete import complexes through NPC. Cell survival assay showed hypersensitivity of 1482Sf to L-buthionine-(S,R)-sulfoximine (BSO), a glutathione-depleting agent. BSO decreased nuclear APTX and ligase I levels in 1482Sf and normal control fibroblasts, but increased SSBs only in 1482Sf. These observations implied that 1482Sf are hypersensitive to BSO and no longer sufficiently repair SSBs. Consistent with this notion, 1482Sf transfected with both APTX and ligase I had increased resistance to BSO, whereas 1482Sf transfected with LacZ vector remained hypersensitive to BSO. We propose that oxidative stress aggravates nuclear import failure, which is already compromised in patient cells. Consequent DNA damage, beyond the limited capacity of DNA repair proteins, i.e., APTX and ligase 1, may participate in triggering cell death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据