4.6 Article

Composite tissue allotransplantation: Classification of clinical acute skin rejection

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 81, 期 3, 页码 418-422

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000185304.49987.d8

关键词

composite tissue allotransplantation; acute rejection; scoring system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is a recently introduced option far limb replacement and reconstruction of other nonreconstructible tissue defects. As with recipients of other allotransplants, CTA recipients can experience rejection episodes that are presumed to be mediated by immune mechanisms similar to those affecting solid organ grafts. However, a systematic examination of this process has not been performed, and there are no standardized criteria for the description of severity or type of rejection Methods. We collected biopsies from human limb allografts and abdominal walls in various stages of rejection for histological and immunohistochemical analysis to formulate a CTA rejection scheme, Biopsies were ranked by severity and reproducibility of the system was tested using a second set of biopsies. Tissue slides were examined blindly by three pathologists and the nonparametric Kendall coefficient of concordance (W) was used to assess the amount of agreement among the pathologists in their classification grades. Results. Rejection initially appeared as a perivascular infiltrate progressing to involve the dermis. Arteritis was observed only in the medium to large size arteries of the subcutis. Myositis was seen occasionally, Perineural involvement without frank, neuritis was present in advanced rejection. The infiltrate was predominantly CD4+ in milder cases and CD8+ in advanced cases. HLA-DR was minimally expressed in keratinocytes even in severe rejection. Kendall's W was 0.9375 (p <= 0.0001). Conclusions. Based on this survey, we proposed an initial classification system tar acute rejection in the skirt of a CTA and demonstrated that this system is easily reproduced by independent pathologists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据