4.8 Article

Genetic and epigenetic analysis of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene alterations and relationship with clinical variables in sporadic renal cancer

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 66, 期 4, 页码 2000-2011

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3074

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic and epigenetic changes in the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor gene are common in sporadic conventional renal cell carcinoma (cRCC). Further insight into the clinical significance of these changes may lead to increased biological understanding and identification of subgroups of patients differing prognostically or who may benefit from specific targeted treatments. We have comprehensively examined the VHL status in tissue samples from 115 patients undergoing nephrectomy, including 96 with sporadic cRCC. In patients with cRCC, loss of heterozygosity was found in 78.4%, mutation in 71%, and promoter methylation in 20.4% of samples. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification identified intragenic copy number changes in several samples including two which were otherwise thought to be VHL-noninvolved. Overall, evidence of biallelic inactivation was found in 74.2% of patients with cRCC. Many of the mutations were novel and approximately two-thirds were potentially truncating. Examination of these and other published findings confirmed mutation hotspots affecting codons 117 and 164, and revealed a common region of mutation in codons 60 to 78. Gender-specific differences in methylation and mutation were seen, although not quite achieving statistical significance (P = 0.068 and 0.11), and a possible association between methylation and polymorphism was identified. No significant differences were seen between VHL subgroups with regard to clinicopathologic features including stage, grade, tumor size, cancer-free and overall survival, with the exception of a significant association between loss of heterozygosity and grade, although a possible trend for survival differences based on mutation location was apparent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据