4.7 Article

The insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor picropodophyllin causes tumor regression and attenuates mechanisms involved in invasion of uveal melanoma cells

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 1383-1391

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1106

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Uveal melanoma has a high mortality rate due to a high incidence of metastasis (up to 50%), which preferentially occurs in the liver. Conventional chemotherapy, being the only therapeutic option today against metastatic uveal melanoma, has not proved to be effective. Therefore, new molecular targets important for malignant phenotype of uveal melanoma have to be found to design efficient pharmacologic agents. Experimental Design: We previously reported data indicating that the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-IR) is a metastasis predictor as well as a therapeutic target for uveal melanoma. In the present study, we made use of the cyclolignan picropodophyllin (PPP), which is an inhibitor of the IGF-IR. Results: We showed that PPP efficiently blocks growth and viability of uveal melanoma cells in cultures and causes tumor regression in xenografted mice. In addition, treatment with PPP inhibited several mechanisms involved in metastasis, including tumor cell adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins, activity and expression of matrix metalloproteinase 2, and cell migration as well as invasion through basement membranes and endothelial cell layers. Furthermore, PPP significantly delayed establishment of uveal melanoma tumors and drastically reduced the incidence of liver metastasis in mice. Conclusions: Our data suggest that IGF-IR is crucial for growth and survival as well as invasion and metastasis of uveal melanoma cells. Targeting this receptor may therefore comprise a strategy to treat ongoing disease (today incurable) as well as a strategy to prevent development of metastases in patients with primary disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据