4.5 Article

Administration of baclofen, a γ-aminobutyric acid type B agonist in the thalamic ventrobasal complex, attenuates allodynia in monoarthritic rats subjected to the ankle-bend test

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 83, 期 3, 页码 515-523

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.20737

关键词

thalamus; chronic pain; inflammation; anti-nociception

向作者/读者索取更多资源

gamma-Aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptors are involved in the modulation of neuronal activity in response to chronic noxious input. However, the effect of their activation in chronic inflammatory pain in relay thalamic nuclei such as the ventrobasal complex (VB) is not known. In this study, experimental groups of 2, 4, and 14 days monoarthritic (MA) rats were injected with saline (controls) or baclofen (0.875 pig), a specific GABA(B) receptor agonist, in the VB contralateral to the inflamed joint, and the ankle-bend test was performed. Ankle-bend scores in control animals were near the maximum and were rather constant throughout the entire experimental period, indicating severe nociception. The same was observed in 2 days MA rats injected with baclofen. In the 4 days MA group, the response to baclofen injection was inconsistent among different animals, whereas, in 14 days MA rats, baclofen caused clear antinociceptive effects. Additionally, a 0.5 mu g dose of baclofen was tested in 14 days MA rats, but no effect was observed, whereas a 1.25 mu g dose produced visible side effects. Baclofen injections that did not target the VB but reached neighboring nuclei were ineffective in reducing nociception. Data demonstrate that the activation of the GABA(B) receptors by baclofen in the VB of MA rats leads to a decrease of nociception. Moreover, the response depends on the time course of the disease, suggesting the occurrence of different excitatory states of thalamic VB neurons. In conclusion, GABA(B) receptors in the VB play an important role in chronic inflammatory pain processing. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据