4.6 Article

Modeling evaluation of the fluid-dynamic microenvironment in tissue-engineered constructs: A micro-CT based model

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 93, 期 3, 页码 500-510

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/bit.20740

关键词

fluid shear stress; micro CT; bioreactor; scaffold; computational fluid dynamics

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM068664-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural cartilage remodels both in vivo and in vitro in response to mechanical stresses, hence mechanical stimulation is believed to be a potential tool to modulate extra-cellular matrix synthesis in tissue-engineered cartilage. Fluid-induced shear is known to enhance chondrogenesis in engineered cartilage constructs. The quantification of the hydrodynamic environment is a condition required to study the biochemical response to shear of 3D engineered cell systems. We developed a computational model of culture medium flow through the microstructure of a porous scaffold, during direct perfused culture. The 3D solid model of the scaffold microgeometry was reconstructed from 250 micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images. The results of the fluid dynamic simulations were analyzed at the central portions of the fluid domain, to avoid boundary effects. The average, median and mode shear stress values calculated at the scaffold walls were 3.48, 2.90, and 2.45 mPa respectively, at a flow rate of 0.5 cm(3)/min, perfused through a 15 mm diameter scaffold, at an inlet fluid velocity of 53 mu m/s. These results were compared to results estimated using a simplified micro-scale model and to results estimated using an analytical macro-scale porous model. The predictions given by the CT-based model are being used in conjunction with an experimental bioreactor model, in order to quantify the effects of fluid-dynamic shear on the growth modulation of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs, to potentially enhance tissue growth in vitro. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据