4.7 Article

Redshifts from Spitzer spectra for optically faint radio-selected infrared sources

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 638, 期 2, 页码 613-621

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/498887

关键词

dust, extinction; galaxies : active; galaxies : high-redshift; galaxies : starburst; infrared : galaxies; radio continuum : galaxies; X-rays : galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spectra have been obtained with the Infrared Spectrograph on the Spitzer Space Telescope for 18 optically faint sources (R greater than or similar to 23.9mag) having f(nu)(24 mu m) > 1.0mJy and having radio detections at 20 cm to a limit of 115 mu Jy. The sources are within the Spitzer First Look Survey. Redshifts are determined for 14 sources from strong silicate absorption features ( 12 sources) or strong PAH emission features ( two sources), with median redshift of 2.1. Results confirm that optically faint sources of similar to 1mJy at 24 mu m are typically at redshifts z similar to 2, verifying the high efficiency in selecting high-redshift sources based on extreme infrared-to-optical flux ratio, and indicate that 24 mu m sources that also have radio counterparts are not systematically different than samples chosen only by their infrared-to-optical flux ratios. Using the parameter q = log [f(nu)(24 mu m)/f(nu)(20 cm)], 17 of the 18 sources observed have values of 0 < q < 1, in the range expected for starburst-powered sources, but only a few of these show strong PAH emission as expected from starbursts, with the remainder showing absorbed or power-law spectra consistent with an AGN luminosity source. This confirms previous indications that optically faint Spitzer sources with f(nu)(24 mu m) >= 1.0 mJy are predominately AGNs and represent the upper end of the luminosity function of dusty sources at z similar to 2. Based on the characteristics of the sources observed so far, we predict that the nature of sources selected at 24 mu m will change for f nu(24 mu m) less than or similar to 0.5 mJy to sources dominated primarily by starbursts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据