4.4 Article

Heparin accelerates gelsolin amyloidogenesis

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 7, 页码 2234-2242

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi0519295

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL062244, R01 HL052622, R01 HL052622-08, R01 HL062244-06, HL52622, HL62244] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG18917, R01 AG018917-02, R01 AG018917] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM038060, R01 GM038060-18, R01 GM038060] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chemical environment of the extracellular matrix may influence the tissue-selective deposition observed there in gelsolin amyloid disease. Previously, we have identified the proteases that generate the amyloidogenic fragments from the full-length gelsolin variants and demonstrated that heparin is capable of accelerating gelsolin amyloidogenesis. Herein, we identify the structural features of heparin that promote the 8 kDa disease-associated gelsolin fragments (residues 173-243) generated at the cell surface to form amyloid. In conjunction with electron microscopy analyses, our kinetic studies demonstrate that heparin efficiently accelerates the formation of gelsolin amyloid by enabling intermolecular beta-sheet formation. The use of heparin analogues reveals that sulfation is important in accelerating amyloidogenesis and that the extent of acceleration is proportional to the molecular weight of heparin. In addition, heparin accelerated aggregation at both early and late stages of amyloidogenesis. Dynamic light scattering coupled to size exclusion chromatography showed that heparin promotes the formation of soluble aggregates. Collectively, these data reveal that heparin templates fibril formation and affords solubility to the aggregating peptides through its sulfated structure. By extension, the biochemical results herein suggest that tissue-selective deposition characteristic of the gelsolin amyloidoses is likely influenced by the extracellular localization of distinct glycosaminoglycans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据